Back Door Amnesty?

Or Our Federal Government at Work Slacking off?

Really, folks — let’s think about our priorities here.
Federal agents have identified people in the country illegally, good.
They’ve processed the paperwork to start the deportation court proceedings, good.
Then the Obama Administration makes a decision to review those cases, Uh-Oh.

The Department of Homeland Security is systematically reviewing thousands of pending immigration cases and moving to dismiss those filed against suspected illegal immigrants who have no serious criminal records, according to several sources familiar with the efforts.

Every time I think the Obama Administration can’t do anything else to leave me dazed and confused, they prove me wrong.

Gonzalez said DHS attorneys are conducting the reviews on a case-by-case basis. However, he said they are following general guidelines that allow for the dismissal of cases for defendants who have been in the country for two or more years and have no felony convictions.

In some instances, defendants can have one misdemeanor conviction, but it cannot involve a DWI, family violence or sexual crime, Gonzalez said.

Given how often cases are plea bargained down, charges dismissed; this really doesn’t give me a warm and fuzzy sense of comfort.

Patterns of criminal behavior usually don’t just stop and change for the better so I’m a little concerned about such a generous criteria being used.

I wondered why the administration would do something like this, then I read these two paragraphs.

Gonzalez called the dismissals a necessary step in unclogging a massive backlog in the immigration court system. In June, there were more than 248,000 cases pending in immigration courts across the country, including about 23,000 in Texas, according to data compiled by researchers at Syracuse University.

In a June 30 memo, ICE Assistant Secretary John Morton outlined the agency’s priorities, saying it had the capacity to remove about 400,000 illegal immigrants annually — about 4 percent of the estimated illegal immigrant population in the country. The memo outlines priorities for the detention and removal system, putting criminals and threats to national security at the top of the list.

So instead of stepping up our ability to remove people who are in the country illegally, let’s put a cap on the number of people we deport each year….a paltry 4%????

I don’t see any other conclusion for this other then it is a step in the process to grant amnesty to illegal aliens.

Maybe the should take the time, energy and money being spend on BackScatter Vans and add a few more people to ICE or even change the law removing firearm licensing requirements and add those people to immigration control.

Please join the discussion.

How’s that victim disarmament working out?

On the evening of July 30, armed men entered the village of Ruvungi, in North Kivu Province.

“They told the population that they were just there for food and rest and that they shouldn’t worry,” said Will F. Cragin, the International Medical Corps’ program coordinator for North Kivu, who visited the village a week after their arrival.

“Then after dark another group came,” said Mr. Cragin, referring to between 200 and 400 armed men who witnesses described as spending days and nights looting Ruvungi and nearby villages.


The gun control crowd — those I call anti-rights advocates – are very big on the whole ‘give them what they want and don’t fight back’ idea.

I have notice they tend to say so from the safety of their  homes – protected by the firearms of their neighbors, the law enforcement and the military.

And what did those villagers get from following the anti’s advice?

A mob of Rwandan rebels gang-raped at least 150 women last month during a weekend raid on a community of villages in eastern Congo, United Nations and other humanitarian officials said Sunday.

“They began to systematically rape the population,” he said, adding, “Most women were raped by two to six men at a time.”

The attackers often took the victims into the bush or into their homes, raping them “in front of their children and their families,” Mr. Cragin said. “If a car passed, they would hide.”

Wonder why they would hide from a car, could it be they feared someone who would fight back?

When the thief is in the house, there isn’t time to run out, buy a firearm and learn to use it.
When the rapists are brutalizing your wife, daughter, friends and neighbors; there isn’t time to run out, buy a firearm and learn to use it.

The Right to Keep and Bear Arms should be protected instead being subjected of ridiculous restrictions (can you say Chicago and Washington D.C.?).

Because no one should have to be subjected to things like what happened in that village without the opportunity to fight back.

Please join the discussion.

Carry your gun — Oh Wait, You can’t

There is an increase in problems at night with small gangs roaming around looking for the right prey

Incidences of “wilding” have increased and people have talked about it on the controversial unofficial blog of the Chicago Police Department, (see More Wildings) www.secondcitycop.blogspot.com

Great blog/site if you’ve never read it.

Coming back to the John Hancock to pick up my car at around 9PM, I noticed several little bands of four to five juveniles walking around sizing up people as they walked down the streets. Luckily we were already in our car, but I could sense that these “gangsta wannabes” were up to no good.

Have you heard about the incidents of “wilding”?

Most people haven’t, even in Chicago — it isn’t getting much coverage.

Wouldn’t you like to have more then a little bitty can of pepper spray with you if approached by 4 or 5 “gansta wannabes” ?

Chicago police say they responded to a fight, the assault of a jogger, and a gang-related shooting all within about three hours Monday night along the lakefront between Fullerton and North Avenues.

Six teens and two adults were arrested.

Most people would, but seeing how this is Chicago — forget about it.

Too bad average citizens don’t have the same rights as the law enforcement officers do

Do you now need a .357 Magnum to walk down the Mag Mile? Maybe a compact .45 or a high-capacity 9MM “just to be on the safe side” is more what you should have. Even the police are telling each other that they better “carry large caliber” off-duty and not be caught unarmed.

Please join the discussion.

Reason to Carry a Gun — Ripple Effect Edition

It started with a thug with a knife but I can’t even begin to figure out how many lives were impacted.

Here is video from a local station of what I’m talking about.

And it shines a on the Lies of the Antis — it’s not just property, it’s people’s lives that are being impacted.

One Woman

The incident began about 2 p.m. Wednesday when a woman called 911 to report that as she left the Sheraton Hotel parking lot in the 1500 block of Calhoun Street in Fort Worth, a man walked up to the driver’s side window of her Chevrolet pickup, reached inside and demanded her keys, a Fort Worth police news release stated.

The man showed the woman that he had a knife and grabbed her purse and keys. The woman got out of the truck, and the robber got in and drove away. She was not injured, the news release stated.

The news this morning reported the woman who was carjacked is unemployed and now because of “reasonable gun control laws” a thug with a knife felt free to take her property. He felt free to destroy her property.

I don’t know if she is married, has kids, living on her own but consider the impact on her life because of this crime.

How many lives did this crime impact?

Could she have stopped it if she had been carrying? I don’t know for sure but I’ll take a lady with a firearm in a car versus a thug with knife any day.

The City

Reyes said Browne had carjacked the pickup in Fort Worth on Wednesday and committed a violent robbery in Dallas early Thursday. In fact, Reyes said, he is suspected in a string of violent crimes.

Let’s see — if he hadn’t been stopped trying to steal the car, is it likely he would have committed a violent robbery on Thursday?

I don’t have details about who was robbed, but do you think it was someone who could afford to loose the money? I don’t.

How many lives did this crime impact?

Nope, again ‘reasonable gun control’ laws contribute not to decreasing crime but its increase.

Early on in the pursuit, one of the rear tires on Browne’s vehicle blew out, and the entire rim soon came off. However, he continued driving on the axle for the duration of the chase, carving a deep groove into the streets on which he drove.

How money out of people’s pocket will go to repair the damage caused by this thug instead of being used to keep libraries or swimming pools open?

How many lives did this crime impact?

The chase wound through Dallas in the middle of the afternoon — took about an hour to cover 15 miles from Arapaho Road to Love field.

It ran through residential and business areas, it even went by a hospital.

How many lives did this crime impact?

The Airport

This is where the ripple effect really starts adding up on a national level.

9 Flights on the tarmac delayed up to 20 minutes, planes forced to delay landing. Doesn’t sound so bad, right?

Except when you consider the business people who were trying to get home or to that important meeting they were flying toward. How many people’s plans were changed, how many thousands of dollars were lost due to the actions of one thug?

How many lives did this crime impact?

Thousands of dollars in sales, in salaries; in deals which fed families or put kids through school.

How many lives did this crime impact?

School is about to start — how many people missed taking their kids to doctor’s appointments or had to wait longer.

The Truth

The sequence started with a woman doing what the antis recommend — giving up a truck because it is only property.

Except that is really isn’t ‘just property’ now is it?


Attacker didn’t get his wish

Subtitle — a lesson in Victim Selection Failure.

The details are still emerging but this much is known; the 29 year old assailant had a plan, had the means to execute that plan, and from the reports I’ve seen was not known to be unstable.
In short, the type of criminal that is almost impossible to predict.

McKINNEY, Texas — A gunman who pulled into a suburban Dallas police station parking lot with a trailer loaded with explosives, set fire to his pickup truck, then started shooting at the building was apparently hoping for a massacre, police say

He was armed or as most of the reports say “heavily armed”

Investigators found an assault rifle, a shotgun and a handgun on Sharp.

Hope the reporters never get a load of the equipment taken to a blog shoot — they would say we are trying to start a small war.
Out of all the armament, all the rounds fired — he injured no one, he killed no one; except perhaps himself. We still don’t know.
Now, why did this attack fail? Victim Selection Failure
Sharp may have intended to lure people from the police station so that he could shoot at them from a field across the street where he had taken position, Kowalski said. He also may have intended to kill them by blowing up the trailer, he said.
That’s right, boys and girls, the assailant chose a police station for his attack – luckily.
The Colin College campus was just on the other side of the wooded area where he was hiding during the attack.
Now school isn’t in session yet, but probably hundreds of students were on campus registering, professors were setting up classroom, staff preparing for the new year — all in a state mandated victim disarmament zone.
We’ve seen the college shootings play out too many times (once is more then enough) but there is no way short of confiscating every firearm and securing colleges like college prisons to stop them.
For the slow people in the audience, for the nanny stater sin the audience (but I repeat myself) — confiscating firearms would not stop this type of attack. Firearms can be smuggled in, can be made or other tools used.
The point to take away from the attack was that it was stopped with minimal loss of life because guns were brought to the scene. Luckily those guns were very close because of the target selected.
Isn’t it time we stop disarming people on our college campuses?

I’m not talking about allowing 17 to 20 year olds to go armed but concealed handgun license (CHL) holders.

People 21 or over, people who have had a background check, been fingerprinted, photographed, trained, and shown competency on a course of fire similar to what law enforcement officers must shoot to qualify.
Heck, many of the CHL holders are veterans returning to school, many of the CHL holders are on campus to get advanced degrees years after getting their first degree.
Isn’t it about time we let the professors, lecturers and staff — people we trust with the safety of our kids decide if they want to protect themselves and their students?
Please join the discussion.

Does the tool matter?

Or does the intent?

Weer’d Beard has been running a series of posts about violent deaths where the instrument of choice was not a firearm.

I decided not to send this one to him but post about it myself. My excuse is that it happened here; like on the roads I travel on. My wife works off of West Lancaster and Rosedale. We travel on 287 occasionally. I work north of down town, heck I was on the streets of down town last week for jury duty.

The story starts out grim — a man kidnaps and kills his ex-girlfriend’s mother.

Police had been searching for Robertson since College Station police alerted them that he was suspected of kidnapping his ex-girlfriend’s mother from a College Station Walmart and stabbing her.

The body of the mother, 59-year-old Anne Toliver, was later found in the parking lot of a shopping center in the 4000 block of Camp Bowie Boulevard.

Later, officers found Toliver’s body. She had been stabbed multiple times, according to the Tarrant County medical examiner’s office.
As always my sympathy, thoughts and prayers go out to the family of the deceased.
Does it really matter which tool he used to kill Ms. Toliver? Not one bit.
His intentions — cold blooded murder matter.
Just as his intentions mattered when the police were chasing him. Check out the video from the police helicopter (courtesy of Star-Telegram)

Notice how he avoided the other cars and aimed directly at the police car — even when the cop tried to get out of the way?

Officer Kerry Gober was treated for injuries at a hospital and was released Sunday, police said.

Robertson remained hospitalized Monday under police guard. In addition to a capital murder charge, he faces a Tarrant County charge of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon in connection with Gober’s injuries.

A car – when used in an attack like this is just as much a deadly weapon as a knife or a firearm. The tool does not matter when the intentions are to unlawfully harm others.

I hope the police also charge Robertson with reckless endangerment for every car on the road and definitely for the 6 cars he passed while driving the wrong way. I believe if he had brandished a firearm at 6 people passing by he would have been charged, don’t you?

Violent thugs will find a way to be violent thugs; either with or without firearms. Making firearms harder to obtain and carry for everyone else only gives the advantage to the thugs. Really makes you wonder if that isn’t the goal of the gun controllers.

Please join the discussion.

He used a what?

Stealing a little of Weer’d Beard’s thunder (since he’s backlogged) I present you a story in his category of “Gun Death“.

LITTLE ROCK, Ark. — An Arkansas doctor accused of seeking revenge on a state medical board that repeatedly disciplined him was found guilty Monday of masterminding a homemade bomb attack that disfigured and partially blinded the board’s chairman.

This is bad enough….a homemade bomb that could have done more then injury the victim, it could have killed the victim or his family but as usual, there is more to the story.

Mann, a federal firearms dealer

Doesn’t say what class of dealer he was — so it could have been anything from a Curio and Relic up.

also was convicted of illegally possessing 98 grenades and a machine gun. He was acquitted of illegally possessing a shotgun.

Not only did he have 98 grenades — only 1 of which was used in the bomb but he had in his possession an actual machine gun!

Here is a case where firearms were not the weapon of choice.

Regardless of what the antis tell you, restricting firearm access will not reduce violence. Criminals will find a way.

Let’s focus on criminal control for a while and see if that works, how about it?

Please join the discussion.