14 Dec
And in federal news
This land is your land, this land is their land and don’t you forget it.
Some control over “private” land is necessary, but only to the minimum degree necessary. Our Overlords Representatives in Washington D.C. seem to have forgotten that.
The Clean Water Restoration Act currently pending in the U.S. Senate could reach to control even a “seasonal puddle” on private property.
“Right now, the law says that the Environmental Protection Agency is in charge of all navigable water,” said Sen. John Barrasso, R-Wyo., chairman of the Senate Western Caucus and an opponent of the bill.
“Well, this bill removes the word ‘navigable,’ so for ranchers and farmers who have mud puddles, prairie potholes — anything from snow melting on their land — all of that water will now come under the regulation of the Army Corps of Engineers and the Environmental Protection Agency,” he said.
Goldman-Carter added that the United States has long regulated streams and other waterways that aren’t ‘navigable’ by boat because to do otherwise would be to allow dumping into smaller water sources that lead to the larger ones used for drinking water and other purposes.
Aside from striking “navigable,” the bill defines U.S. water as “all waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide, the territorial seas and all interstate and intrastate waters and their tributaries, including lakes, rivers, streams (including intermittent streams), mudflats, sandflats, wetlands, sloughs, prairie potholes, wet meadows, playa lakes, natural ponds and all impoundments of the foregoing, to the fullest extent that these waters.”
So, now even the puddle that forms in front of my house will under EPA control? Wow, what an incredible and blatant disregard of our traditional property rights.
While the bill supposedly contains provisions to protect some, do you think the government will really follow its own rules if they want stick it to someone?
“That amended language is very clear that it preserves long standing exemptions for ongoing agricultural practices, forest roads. There are a number of very generous exemptions in there particularly for ranchers and farmers that I know have been worried about the effect of this legislation, but in fact those worries are largely unfounded,” she said.
Largely founded? Sorry but in this time of government take over of just about everything….I don’t see anything as “largely unfounded”, do you?
As if we didn’t have enough to worry about:
It adds that any “activities affecting these waters are subject to the legislative power of Congress under the Constitution.”
Any activity? That allows for a considerable stretch of governmental interference and don’t think the bureaucratic drones working for the government won’t use it.
Please join the discussion.

Posted by Linoge on 14.12.09 at 3:04 PM
Well, that would explain why the EPA is buying Glocks.
I really have to wonder where in the Constitution the government is given the ability to appropriate a natural resource that happens to be on privately-owned property of an American citizen, especially given that your last blockquote seems to indicate that the bureaucratic weenies pushing this through are claiming to do so under the auspices of that document. It must be that “for your own good” clause everyone keeps talking about yet no one produces…
Posted by Bob S. on 14.12.09 at 3:04 PM
When the pieces of a puzzle come together like this….are we really paranoid ?
Or perhaps just a little too insightful?
Posted by Thomas on 14.12.09 at 3:04 PM
The EPA needs GLOCKs so they can say things like “Mr. Maple Tree, keep you’re branches where we can see them, I’ve got you covered, and you WILL let that stinky hippy hug you!” Trees are not always complacent around tree huggers. Would you want to be hugged by a dirty stinky hippy? Trees have feelings too.
Posted by Keith on 14.12.09 at 3:04 PM
We’re still free to do whatever we want, as long as we ask nicely and remember to say please.
Posted by Thomas on 14.12.09 at 3:04 PM
When they passed tha warbler protection act in neighboring Travis County, Texas a while back, I personally knew developers that were shooting the endangered species on sight when found and destroying their nests because if anybody found out one of those little birds lived on their land they wanted to develop it would stall the project, possibly forever.
Government ecology people are poor chess players and never think a step ahead as to what the actual results of their meddling are gonna be. That’s why the work for the government, most likely. “Government Jobs, Find Your INNER MEDIOCRITY!”
I see a lot of ponds and streams on private land being filled in soon…