Another Win for MikeB302000

Our perennial winner of the much coveted Troll Of The Day Award MikeB302000 sinks to his usual incredibly low depths with today’s comment.

MikeB302000 dropped this incredible statement over at Snowflakes in Hell.

A wealthy celebrity or public figure may have real need of protection. Average citizens don’t, especially in New York City these days. I’m sure you’ve read the recent reports.

Gee, I’m amazed at MikeB302000‘s willingness to believe reports since those reports contain statistics.

This map is over a year old but I don’t see a single celebrity listed on it.

Crime is falling in New York City, to near historic lows,

The city is on track, for the second time in three years, to have the fewest homicides in a 12-month period since the current record keeping system began. As of Sunday, there had been 461; the record low was in 2007, when there were 496 for the entire year.

But I think that 461 people murdered would belie the fact that the “average person” in New York City doesn’t need protection.

Also the 890 people forcibly raped, 22,186 people robbed, 24,831 victims of aggravated assault, and nearly 150,000 victims of property crime might disagree. Of course MikeB302000 who is so willing to trust statistics knows better then the victims or other people actually living in the city.

Hey Sparky, why don’t you quit living in a fantasy land where bad things don’t happen to “average” people.

By the way Sparky — since you are visiting here – why not comment? There are many posts about subjects you say you want to discuss, yet you don’t often leave a comment?

Why is that?

14 Responses to this post.

  1. Posted by Sebastian on 29.12.09 at 08:37

    Like I said in the comments:

    One would presume that MikeB would not think that Tiger Woods would be a hypocrite for starting a group called Golfers Against Adultery. Famous people, after all, especially athletes named “Tiger,” just have a difficult time resisting all those women who want to sleep with him. It’s not like that for ordinary people, who lack the same temptations.

  2. Posted by Bob S. on 29.12.09 at 08:37

    Sebastian,

    Those of us who commented at MikeB302000 blog for many months are very familiar with his brand of hypocrisy. It only applies to those that disagree with him or those like him.

  3. Posted by Gareth A on 29.12.09 at 08:37

    Bob,

    I’ve noticed the comments getting worse when JadeGold turned up. Mike happily glosses over Jade’s derogatory remarks about “gunloons”, yet when anyone replies with a fraction of what Jade shouts, Mike says they’re the ones being inflammatory.

    He also gushed about Jade, saying that if the pro-facts people are pissed, Jade must be doing something right.. Given his almost stalker-like behaviour in the past, I suppose we can use that as evidence that antis really do have a fucked up sense of right and wrong.

  4. Posted by Bob S. on 29.12.09 at 08:37

    Gareth,

    I haven’t been to MikeB302000’s blog in a while. I take it Jadegold is commenting over there?

    Why am I not surprised???

    It’s amazing the hypocrisy that MikeB302000 continually displays. He got his panties in a bunch when we applied his logic to a different right – using the child pron angle.

    Blamed me for him having to moderate comments because it so greatly offended him to have his logic used against him.

    I suppose we can use that as evidence that antis really do have a fucked up sense of right and wrong.

    Given that MikeB302000 didn’t let gun control laws stop him, advocates breaking the law – you nailed it.

  5. Posted by Gareth A on 29.12.09 at 08:37

    Bob,

    Yep, just started a few days ago. Mike welcomed him with (paraphrasing) “I’ve read a lot of the gun owner’s comments about you, and if you’re pissing them off, you must be doing something right”, hence my comment.

    I read the cp arguement, great points. No wonder he complained, it’s *obviously* unfair that they can’t refute your points.

    I remember reading a few of Jade’s older posts on HuffPo, constantly referring to Thirdpower as his place of work (or at least, what Jade said was). I can’t see any reason for that than to say “I know where you live”, seriously stalking the poor sod.

    Did I hear right, and Jade threatened to get the police involved at one point?

  6. Posted by Linoge on 29.12.09 at 08:37

    JadeGold is back, he is posting over at MikeB302000‘s place, and the latter has enthusiastically welcomed the former? Why am I not at all surprised? Speaking as one of JG’s cyberstalking victims, I can personally profess as to the unestimable depths that particular individual will sink to in order to make a point, score a point, or simply be a general-purpose jack-off – if you dare disagree with him, you can bloody well bet that every single aspect of your personal life he can find online will be published, berated, ridiculed, and paraded, with no regard for personal privacy, dignity, or even relevancy. In fact, in the past, JadeGold even went so far as to vehemently, loudly, incessantly, and vociferously claim, all over the internet, that a certain man was an unconvicted murderer, and while the man in question did share a first and last name, he was all the way across the county from the murderer. JG took that boatride far enough and long enough that people finally had sufficient cause to contact his ISP, who promptly yanked his access. Personally, I have had to block over 100 separate IPs and proxies to keep him from leaving threatening, intimidating, inappropriate, or excessively personal comments on my webpage – in retrospect, I should have kept copies and turned them over to the authorities. (Speaking of, Bob, when JG starts posting my personal information (which he will, if he meanders his way over here), I would respectfully request that you edit it out appropriately.)

    As a troll, he is really nothing spectacular, spouting off the same tired talking points, disproven studies, and other nonsense so prevalent on the anti-rights side of the spectrum, but he is much better at casting baseless insinuations and accusations than MikeB, and far more scummy in his approach and methodolgies. He would much rather silence you through intimidation than engage you on a level playing field. The first Google hit for his moniker should tell you all you need to know.

    That MikeB302000 supports JG and condones his actions speaks volumes as to the character, or lack thereof, of the former. Of course, this is the same individual who enthusiastically supports the deranged rantings of a murderous sociopath, so it should be no great surprise.

    And speaking of Mikey, I am not at all surprised that he would prefer to see average, every-day American citizens die, be robbed/raped/assaulted/mugged, or otherwise become the victim of crimes, rather than be allowed to decide whether or not they will equip and train themselves to defend themselves… After all, that is what he has been working for, supporting, extolling, and arguing for ever since he picked up the anti-rights torch. If nothing else, he is consistent…. consistently an ignorant bigot who cannot tell fact from fiction, but still consistent.

  7. Posted by Thomas on 29.12.09 at 08:37

    straightarrow summed it up at Kurt’s place,

    And mikeb I suggest that your existence is an anomaly. You are the only truly non-sentient creature I have ever encountered who can operate a keyboard.

  8. Posted by mikeb302000 on 29.12.09 at 08:37

    Thanks for all the comments guys. Calling me a hypocrite and a troll doesn’t make it so, even if you repeat it as often as you do.

    I find it hilarious what you say about JadeGold. Maybe he just hasn’t gotten warmed up at my place yet, but so far, aside from using the term “gunloon,” he’s been much more civil than most of you.

    Bob and Linoge, not linking to me when you quote me is shabby behaviour. And coming from guys like you who always talk about rights and who paint yourselves as people who have standards of living and know the difference between right and wrong, coming from guys like you it makes for a good example of hypocrisy (that favorite word even of Sebastian). Naturally you continually accuse me of the very thing that you do. That’s a good tactic for those with a weak argument.

    And, yes I think rich celebrities, especially ones like Bloomberg who probably receive frequent death threats from gun lovers, should be able to arm themselves or use body guards. That’s one of the perqs of being rich and famous and doesn’t necessarily have anything to do with his opinion about gun control, unless as I mentioned at Sebastian’s place, he demanded total bans on all guns..

    There are many other things that poor people can’t do either. They can’t take skiing vacations or go to the Bahamas, they can’t drive safe and reliable cars, some of them can’t even feed their families properly. So what we’re talking about is a form of elitism or a caste system of the haves and the have nots, more than hypocrisy.

  9. Posted by Bob S. on 29.12.09 at 08:37

    MikeB302000,

    Bob and Linoge, not linking to me when you quote me is shabby behaviour.

    Accusing law abiding gun owners of being involved in crimes or responsible for criminal behavior is shabby behavior. Yet you’ve done that for months and still continue to do so.

    That is hypocrisy.

    And coming from guys like you who always talk about rights and who paint yourselves as people who have standards of living and know the difference between right and wrong,

    Again you don’t seem to know what you are talking about– yet that never stops you.
    Rights — personal liberties — are completely different in this context from RIGHT & Wrong. Please try to exhibit a modicum of intelligence.

    You complain because we leave your comments up instead of deleting them. You complain because we allow you to post anything you want to instead of implementing an ever changing “commenting policy”. We simply have stated that any comments you leave will not be LINKED back to your site. Notice Sparky that we don’t change your name or make it difficult for anyone other then pro-ignorance,anti-freedom liberals to find you.

    And, yes I think rich celebrities, especially ones like Bloomberg who probably receive frequent death threats from gun lovers, should be able to arm themselves or use body guards

    I actually agree with you Sparky. I think they should be able to arm themselves or use body guard.
    Unlike you, I don’t believe they should be hypocritical to say they can have that protection but not the “average citizen”. You know the “average citizen” who is more likely to actually be the victim of a crime then a rich, well protected “celebrity”. Again you do us a favor by showing your hypocrisy. Thanks Sparky.

    here are many other things that poor people can’t do either. They can’t take skiing vacations or go to the Bahamas, they can’t drive safe and reliable cars, some of them can’t even feed their families properly

    Are you totally lacking in common sense or do you just play the idiot for hits on your blog????

    We aren’t talking about luxuries, we are talking about basic natural or God Given rights (whichever you prefer). Everyone should have the same rights. You have the right to speak your piece, just like Bloomberg. Since you aren’t rich, should your right to free speech be curtailed?

    Also Sparky, I know many “poor people” who do vacation in the Bahamas or take skiing vacations. Again you show elitism and contempt for what the “average citizen” is capable of doing.

    Most “poor people” do drive safe and reliable cars Sparky. You show your lack of common sense and reality by making statements like this.

  10. Posted by Linoge on 29.12.09 at 08:37

    Calling me a hypocrite and a troll doesn’t make it so, even if you repeat it as often as you do.

    No, your own words and actions make you the hypocrite and troll – we are simply pointing it out to clear up any confusion.

    I find it hilarious what you say about JadeGold.

    You find it hilarious that JG would try to invade someone else’s life, intimidate them, intimidate their families, potentially destroy their lives (i.e. publish all over the internet that someone is a murderer when, in fact, they were not), and use various other underhanded, dastardly, and plain-disgusting tactics simply because JG disagreed with what they were saying?

    To put it quite simply, and as politely as I can, you are simply disgusting. You are a disgrace to the human species, you are a filthy collaborator with those who would silence opposition by force, and you are gorramed scum. You are an inveterate liar. You support sociopathic wanna-be murderers. And you facilitate those who use insinuation, specious allegations, and invasion of privacy to destroy other people’s lives. It has gotten to the point that I feel as though I have to wash my hands every time I come across your depraved, irrational, revolting rantings on the internet.

    Bob and Linoge, not linking to me when you quote me is shabby behaviour.

    I never quoted you in this thread. Stop lying (fat chance of that).

    And coming from guys like you who always talk about rights and who paint yourselves as people who have standards of living and know the difference between right and wrong, coming from guys like you it makes for a good example of hypocrisy.

    It is my right, and it is my freedom, to link to whatever I want, for whatever reason I want, in whatever manner I want. Doing so when I firmly believe in individual freedoms is far from “hypocrisy”, but that claim is nothing more than another bald-faced lie from our resident pond scum.

    Furthermore, filth, I am linking to your very own words. Why are you so against that? Why do you not want your opinions, your statements, your beliefs, your positions trumpeted to the whole world? What are you hiding? Why do you want those statements hidden? Why do you not want them linked? Or is it, as Breda found out, that you are only interested in linking to your own webpage? Is it that you really are nothing more than a disgusting troll, looking to stir up trouble and traffic for his own pathetic little webpage? Your repulsive words and actions support that theory on a daily basis.

    Why do you not simply be a man, stand up, and admit that you are pissed that we are drawing traffic away from your site? Why not admit to being the attention whore you obviously are? Things would be much simply if you were simply honest with yourself and us… But, again, fat chance of that, eh?

    That’s a good tactic for those with a weak argument.

    So sayeth the filth who has never provided an argument that was not fed to him by an anti-rights organization, has never fielded an argument that had an ounce of facts, figures, or statistics supporting it, and has never understood the basic tenets or concepts of “logic” or “reason”. For Christ’s sake, so sayeth a scumbag who cannot even tell fact from fiction. Excuse me while I pick myself up off the floor after I laugh my ass off. You wanted hypocrisy? Your above sentence is positively oozing with it.

    And, yes I think rich celebrities, especially ones like Bloomberg who probably receive frequent death threats from gun lovers, should be able to arm themselves or use body guards.

    Ahh, yes, more baseless allegations and made-up demonizations. Is that what passes as a “strong” argument in your world?

    Furthermore, is that the same logic-lacking “reasoning” you used when you illegally owned firearms in the past? It is ok for me, but not them, for whatever reason I feel is appropriate at the time? As I said before: disgusting.

    All human beings, regardless of socioeconomic positions, have the same rights to self-preservation and self-defense, and as such, have the exact same rights to avail themselves, however they are financially capable of doing so, of the modern technology to ensure their preservation and sanctity. Hypocrisy or not, what Bloomberg is proposing is blatantly immoral and discriminatory, something any self-respecting “liberal” would be automatically against. Of course, it was those self-same “liberals” in another time who disarmed the blacks simply because they did not like them… I guess it is time for any poor person to face up to the prospect of being a second-class citizen.

    There are many other things that poor people can’t do either. They can’t take skiing vacations or go to the Bahamas, they can’t drive safe and reliable cars, some of them can’t even feed their families properly.

    False analogy, not that I expected any better from you. The poor people are incapable of doing those things because they cannot afford them, not because they are treated as subhuman servants not deserving of basic human rights.

    More lies, more misdirection, more baseless allegations, and more specious “logic”… and the cotninued, enthusiastic support of yet another base, repugnant individual who would sooner silence his opponents by force than engage in anything approximating an even discussion. You are known by the company you choose to keep, scum, and yours is indeed showing your true nature.

  11. Posted by Linoge on 29.12.09 at 08:37

    Blast. Seems as though I missed a blockquote. Oh well.

    {Admin– I think I found the blockquote you missed -forget to open it all– Let me know and I’ll edit if I missed it -Bob S.}

  12. Posted by mike w. on 29.12.09 at 08:37

    There are many other things that poor people can’t do either. They can’t take skiing vacations or go to the Bahamas, they can’t drive safe and reliable cars, some of them can’t even feed their families properly. So what we’re talking about is a form of elitism or a caste system of the haves and the have nots, more than hypocrisy.

    As usual MikeB your level of stupidity is so high I find it hard to fathom. The citizens of NYC are not prohibited from owning and carrying firearms because they’re poor. They are prohibited by law from protecting themselves in the very manner that Bloomberg protects himself.

    That is 100% hypocrisy.

  13. Posted by mike w. on 29.12.09 at 08:37

    you are simply disgusting.

    Pretty much. Hell MikeB continues to defend Laci, who makes a point of constantly advocating the outright murder of gun owners simply because she disagrees with them. I find MikeB and his ilk disgusting and contemptible, yet you”ll never year me talk about how wanting to kill them all off.

    You talk about “standards of decency” yet you associate yourself with folks like Laci? That’s pretty bad, even for you MikeB.

    You complain that we don’t link back to you, claiming it is bad ettiquite, yet you slander us as a group every chance you get and you outright delete comments. You are a hypocrite

  14. Posted by Thomas on 29.12.09 at 08:37

    Mike W: Can I still advocate the Spanish Donkey for their ilk? After a trial, of course…then put it on youtubes.